Thoughts on the Sovereignty of God
Denying the elective purposes
of God in salvation has had devastating consequences for the church. Open
Theism and other “progressive” theologies have emerged that arrogantly claim
that God’s knowledge is not eternally fixed and that His providential dealings
with man is not meticulous. These claims have their origin in the rejection of
the supremacy and sovereignty of God. Let us examine closely the price that has
been paid theologically for rejecting God’s way.
Synergists claim God would be
unfair to elect some and not others. However, in regards to the matters of
faith, why is faith wrought in some but not others. If the answer is that some
men come to faith on their own, what allows them to come to faith when all men
are equally depraved and unworthy.
The answer of course is that
salvation is based on the eternal decree of God. Faith is a gift of God that is
given as God’s sovereign good pleasure. Faith originates as an operation of the
Holy Spirit.
Synergists falsely assume faith is the
possession of every man. This is a half truth. Men have faith in believing the
chair they are sitting will not collapse but this skirts the core issue which
is salvific faith. What about “saving”
faith, the Holy Spirit “creating faith within”?
Paul states in Thessalonians,
“And that we may be delivered from unreasonable and wicked men: for all men
have not faith.” II Thess 3:2
How do Christians know that
all men do not have faith? Because faith is a gift of God. Gifts are not
distributed universally and if so the gift is no longer a gift.
What is the result of
diminishing God’s sovereignty?
- God’s
good pleasure has become man’s good pleasure.
- Merit
is called grace. How arrogant to corrupt the doctrine of grace.
- Faith
is no longer a gift but something all men have. It just needs to be
rightly directed.
- God’s
self determination is no longer important. Self determination describes a
God who is transcendent and self consistent. It speaks to His sovereignty in
all matters of purpose.
God’s self determining will
and self consistency, the I Am who I Am, is now the mutable I am who you say I
should be. Self autonomy and human will trumps decrees and purposes. Secret counsels and mysteries regarding salvation do not exist.
“ He shall save His people from their sin”
(Matthew 1:21) becomes “people will save themselves from
their sins if they so choose.
“ All that the Father gives to me” (John 6:37) is now “all that come to me
I will give to the Father”.
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God." (Ephesians 2:8)
Synergists have changed to "For by faith are ye saved through grace; and that of yourselves in cooperation with grace: it is the exertion of faith".
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God." (Ephesians 2:8)
Synergists have changed to "For by faith are ye saved through grace; and that of yourselves in cooperation with grace: it is the exertion of faith".
The sovereign truth“ No one can come to me unless it is granted to him by the Father” John
6:65 is reduced to “ No one can come to me unless he exerts his will
in faith”.
“Who will have all men to be saved, and to
come unto the knowledge of the truth”. I
Timothy 1:4 is modified by Arminius
to “God would have all men to be
saved, but, compelled with the stubborn malice of some, he changes his purpose,
and will have them to perish.”
Where
is God’s sovereignty? Not only are God’s decrees
invalidated but God becomes mutable. God’s sovereignty is stripped as He must
elect those who elect themselves.
Scripture:
“ Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called,
them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.” Rom 8:30
Arminians: Delete, ignore, suppress, call conceptual, or
quote the mantra “ God is not willing that any should perish”.
Scripture: “ No one can come to me unless it is granted to him by the Father” Jn
6:65
Arminians: “ No one can come to me unless he exerts his will
in faith”.
Those denying God His due sovereignty:
- Take the most humbling of all doctrines, election to salvation, and accuse its proponents as having pride.
- Accuse God of a breach of fairness when fairness would keep the accuser himself in reprobation.
- Procures core doctrines of the church only to weaken, pillage , and suppress them.
- Rejects God’s fixed ordained liberty, transforming liberty into an obstacle of freedom.
- Proposes an indifferent spontaneous will to advance free will and in doing so suspends choice altogether.
- Assumes God’s sovereignty threatens free will when His sovereignty intervenes to free man from his fallen nature.
- Accuses God of frustrating man’s will but have no problem diminishing God’s will.
- Robs God of His due glory by denying God His sovereign choices.
- Makes
purpose conditional. Purpose must be a prior event to any sovereign decree
as purpose includes future goal.
“Moreover whom He did predestinate, them He also called . . . “ Romans
8:30
There is no event or work
that determines whether one is predestinated. If that were true grace would be
nullified. Obviously, predestination is a matter of decree and outside human
history. The classic argument that predestination is based on God’s
foreknowledge
is not only wrong but impossible.
Satan hates grace. He is
using God’s attribute of sovereignty to disparage the doctrine of grace. “Look”,
Satan proffers to the sinner . Grace is discriminating. Grace demonstrates favor.
Grace takes away your liberty. Grace is unfair as you know that the religious
deserves salvation more than the prostitute. God’s decree of salvation by grace
robs you of your choice.
Surrendering to these false assumptions is largely due to
man’s ignorance regarding God’s sovereignty in providing salvation. Many
Christians are unable to accept God’s sovereign grace. Grace is discriminating.
Grace demonstrates favor. Grace puts salvation in the sovereign hand of God
rather than the sovereign hand of man.
"Open Theism and other “progressive” theologies have emerged that arrogantly claim that God’s knowledge is not eternally fixed and that His providential dealings with man is not meticulous. "
ReplyDeleteHow is this arrogant? Surely the question is, is it scriptural? If it is scriptural, how is it arrogant? It is a question of being true or not true. If it is not scriptural - then surely it is enough to say just that. From what I can see Open Theists take their position based on scripture, rather than being arrogant. You may disagree with their conclusions - but it isn't appropriate to pronounce what their motivations are.
Yes arrogant as in Isaiah 45:9. ". . .shall the clay say to him that fashions it, what maketh thou? or thy work." The Israelites were stripping God of His sovereignty. A Woe judgment was pronounced. When humanistic mutable counsels replace God's decrees, that is arrogance. When grace requires cooperation of man that is arrogance. When predestination centers upon conditions fulfilled by men that is arrogance. When we are Sons of God by the will of man that is arrogance. Open Theists are humanists and its tenets unscriptural.
Delete